home

Economicss Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM,envites applications for appointment of Young Professionals and Consultants (Grade I) on a contractual basis.)


ABOUT

EAC-PM

Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM) is an independent body constituted to give advice on economic and related issues to the Government of India, specifically to the Prime Minister. At present, there are a Chairman, 3 Full-Time Members and 11 Part-Time Members in the EAC-PM.
The composition of EAC-PM is as follows:

Prof. S. Mahendra Dev

Sh. Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Sh. Sanjeev Sanyal

Dr. Shamika Ravi

Sh. Rakesh Mohan

Dr. Sajjid. Z. Chinoy

Sh. Neelkanth Mishra

Sh. Nilesh Shah

Prof. T. T. Ram Mohan

Dr. Soumya Kanti Ghosh

Prof. K. V. Raju

Prof. Chetan Ghate

Prof. Pami Dua

Prof. Pulak Ghosh

Sh. Gaurav Vallabh

 
The Terms of Reference of EAC-PM include analyzing any issue, economic or otherwise, referred to it by the Prime Minister and advising him thereon, addressing issues of macroeconomic importance and presenting views thereon to the Prime Minister. These could be either suo-motu or on reference from the Prime Minister or anyone else. They also include attending to any other task as may be desired by the Prime Minister from time to time.

Team

Prof. S. Mahendra Dev

Chairman

Shri Sanjeev Sanyal

Member

Shri Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Member

Dr. Shamika Ravi

Member

Dr. Rakesh Mohan

Part-Time Member

Dr. Sajjid Z. Chinoy

Part-Time Member

Shri Neelkanth Mishra

Part-Time Member

Prof. Pulak Ghosh

Part-Time Member

Reports

Constituency Size, Composition and the Case for Delimitation in India’s Lok Sabha (2009–2024)

India’s parliamentary constituencies are very large by global standards: the median Lok Sabha Parliamentray Constituency (PC) electorate reached 1.82 million registered electors in 2024. The conventional reading of Indian turnout has been that very large PCs suppress voting; we show this “size penalty” is now a compositional artefact. Across 2,171 PC-elections in 2009, 2014, 2019 and 2024, the unconditional small-vs-large decile turnout gap halved from +22.86 to +12.03 percentage points (pp), yet the conditional 1 M-vs-2 M turnout gap crossed from +1.42 pp (95% CI: −2.85, +5.69) in 2009 to −6.16 pp (95% CI: −10.30, −2.02) in 2024 once urban, SC, ST shares, Esteban–Ray linguistic polarisation, Shannon linguistic diversity (122-language grain) and polling-station density are controlled. Urban share is the largest single compositional channel associated with female turnout at 52.4 % (95% CI: 44.6, 60.2), followed by linguistic diversity at 28.2 % (95% CI: 21.4, 35.1) and linguistic polarisation at 20.6 % (95% CI: 14.3, 27.0); linguistic diversity also displays an opposite-sign gender split (men: −8.2 %). A turnout-maximising delimitation counterfactual that splits 543 PCs into 824 (59 two-way, 111 three-way) holding parent-PC compositional covariates fixed is predicted to raise national turnout by +2.32 pp (95% CI: +1.43, +3.21) under our preferred specification, with substantial sensitivity to alternative specifications: re-running the same exercise under three alternative specifications returns +1.42 pp, +1.17 pp and +0.30 pp respectively, giving a defensible range of +0.3 to +2.3 pp. The plan delivers a small female-favourable tilt of +0.21 pp (95% CI: −0.14, +0.56).

View

How to do Process Reforms: Case study of IEPFA

Economic reform debates usually tend to gravitate towards the big reforms. Reforms such as tax system overhauls, introduction of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), inflation targeting usually dominate headlines. These are structural reforms, which make changes to the underlying framework of an economy. While such reforms are important, they overlook a quieter but equally powerful source of improvement, which we term as ‘process reforms’.

View

Economic impact analysis of Priority Sector Lending

The policy on priority sector lending has been in place in India for almost five decades and banks are required to direct at least 40% of their overall credit towards the priority sector. The priority sector encompasses a broad range of economic activities such as the provision of credit to small and marginal farmers, micro enterprises and weaker sections aiming to address systemic equity gaps. Growth considerations are also addressed through this policy as the priority sector includes activities that serve as economic multipliers like exports, medium enterprises and corporate farmers.

View

Reimagining the Care Economy: From Private Burden to Social and Economic Infrastructure

India’s demographic profile is shifting - a growing share of elders and declining fertility, compounded by rapid urbanisation that is eroding the traditional family structures that have historically provided care. Indian states are at varying stages of this demographic transition– from high child dependency to accelerating elderly dependency. The pressures of declining fertility and ageing have increasingly prompted some state governments to respond through measures aimed at reversing demographic trends or easing the financial cost of raising children.

View

What the Data Cannot Say: Small-Sample Inference and India’s National Accounts

The recent paper by Anand, Felman and Subramanian (2026) argues that India’s January 2015 national accounts methodology revision caused GDP growth to be overstated by approximately 1.5-2 percentage points per year between FY2011-12 and FY2024-25. The paper presents evidence for this view using informal-sector survey data, cross-country regressions, and correlation analysis that is the focus of this note. It has gathered some attention in media, and in political discussions, recently.

View

Unlocking Rural Property Rights: Social Inclusion and Credit Expansion through SVAMITVA

The Government of India’s introduction of the SVAMITVA scheme marks a landmark policy effort in rural property-rights reform. By seeking to provide formal recognition to residential abadi holdings that have long remained outside clear legal and financial records, the scheme lays foundation for stronger tenure security, better local governance and wider participation in formal credit markets. This paper evaluates how SVAMITVA by formalizing rural property rights has significantly enabled women and those at the bottom the pyramid to leverage such residential property rights as a collateral to gain access to formal credit. Using granular level data and high-dimensional fixed-effects difference-in-differences and triple-difference specifications, the baseline estimates show that sanctioned loan amounts increased by 23% in districts where SVAMITVA were implemented after rollout. The gains are distributionally progressive: borrowers from backward classes experience an additional 21% increase , while borrowers in Aspirational Districts record an additional 23% increase, both over common treatment effect of 23%. Among women, the strongest gains are concentrated at the bottom of the pyramid: the bottom 20% of women borrowers see a 24% increase in sanctioned loan amounts. In particular, across all such women, Muslim women exhibit an incremental 5.8% increase over the common treatment effect of 23%. This increase is significant as Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act that was passed in 2019 rendered the practice of triple talaq void and aimed to strengthen Muslim women’s legal protection. Thus, it is the possible that 2021 SVAMTIVA act coupled with 2019 Muslim Women Act has created a favorable institutional impact. Overall, the findings suggest that SVAMITVA relaxed collateral constraints, deepened formal credit access, and did so in a socially and spatially inclusive manner. We recommend that a SVAMITVA-like scheme be launched in urban India as well to integrate scattered land records across states and the ongoing NAKSHA scheme be extended to all Urban Local Bodies.

View